:ak47:
You foreigners will never understand American culture and what it means to live in that culture. At least you could make an effort....
I think both of these guys are oppurtunistic pricks. Can't say I really like either one of them.
Who's a bigger sh*thead?
- Thread starter PigVomit1732031814
- Start date
:ak47:
You foreigners will never understand American culture and what it means to live in that culture. At least you could make an effort....
I think both of these guys are oppurtunistic pricks. Can't say I really like either one of them.
dave_rhino
Closed Account
Rush to me. I can't believe he's still on the radio :|
Sounds right to me.
Finally, a bipartisan thread.
I like Rush. He does talk a lot of shit, but it's entertaining to listen to him. Moore, though, that fat-fuck meatball-looking piece of shit, I can't stand him.
i gotta go with Rush Limpdick. Not sure who Michael Moore is but I know for a fact that Limpdick is a racist bastard thats always sticking his foot in his mouth...
You're kidding. Michael Moore has a smidgen of credibility? "Right goals" is a matter of opinion, I think.
:nono:
Jagger69
Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
1) Hottie? I mean, Dana isn't ugly bit she ain't no "hottie" by my standards.
2) He is still married to his THIRD wife while dating this chick. Class act.
I wonder if he's back on the Oxycodone?
Rush by far.
There's a lot that could be said on a fact-by-fact basis to support Moore and to dis Limbaugh, but I'll just stick to this for now:
If you listen to them long enough (and I've spent many hours listening to both of them - although Limbaugh has certainly spent many, many, many more hours spewing hot air than Moore has) it becomes pretty clear that Limbaugh cares about very little beyond himself, his ratings, and his insatiable ego. He couldn't care less about anyone beyond himself and perhaps a small handful of his immediate loved ones (I'm thinking mostly his mommy & daddy and his little right-wing brother).
Moore, on the other hand, genuinely seems to care about people other than himself. If he didn't I think it would be extremely tedious and boring to make a lot of the films and tv shows that he has. If you couldn't give a rat's ass about the people of Flint, Michigan (or the USA overall), it would be hard to take the time to make films about its downfall....
I'm sure Moore's got his foibles, quirks, and flaws - he's human, too - but he definitely has his heart in the right place and isn't willfully ignorant and reckless and bellicose like Limbaugh the hate-filled bastard...
If you listen to them long enough (and I've spent many hours listening to both of them - although Limbaugh has certainly spent many, many, many more hours spewing hot air than Moore has) it becomes pretty clear that Limbaugh cares about very little beyond himself, his ratings, and his insatiable ego. He couldn't care less about anyone beyond himself and perhaps a small handful of his immediate loved ones (I'm thinking mostly his mommy & daddy and his little right-wing brother).
Moore, on the other hand, genuinely seems to care about people other than himself. If he didn't I think it would be extremely tedious and boring to make a lot of the films and tv shows that he has. If you couldn't give a rat's ass about the people of Flint, Michigan (or the USA overall), it would be hard to take the time to make films about its downfall....
I'm sure Moore's got his foibles, quirks, and flaws - he's human, too - but he definitely has his heart in the right place and isn't willfully ignorant and reckless and bellicose like Limbaugh the hate-filled bastard...
Thank you for taking the time to say almost exactly how I feel about it also.I only voted intially as really I thought most had fixed ideas on such here.But maybe since a few have said they are unfamilair with Moore their is some who will become more aware of who he is now.I have not seen all of Moore's movies but have seen "Roger and me","Fahrenheit 911" and most recently "Sicko".How anyone could watch "Sicko" and then defend the current system in the US would amaze me.I can see how some may disagree with his solutions and conclusions but on the facts I think Moore is very accurate.Rush on the other hand I think can easily be proven to say things routinely which are just not true.
Well said, and fair enough. I think there is some good in him, but I still think he's a publicity whore.
The best one, you missed; Bowling for Columbine. He's a gun-grabber, which I just can't agree with. He's a bright guy though, his films are well put together.
Similar threads
